- Silverlight for mac 10.12 install#
- Silverlight for mac 10.12 drivers#
- Silverlight for mac 10.12 full#
- Silverlight for mac 10.12 free#
Html just doesn’t have anything that could make it native. It’s parsed, interpreted and rendered in a browser.
It never was, never will be, and never can be native. It’s like trying to hammer a nail with a diesel pile driver. Seriously, i don’t understand the obsession with html “applications” these days. (Your whole complaint on the topic of ChromeBook is off-topic.)
Silverlight for mac 10.12 free#
However, considering that there is a healthy competition between browsers, Microsoft is free to announce extensions like this all hey want. Like only Microsoft’s keys are installed in UEFI. The issue with Microsoft’s policy is not that they do it, it’s the fact that their actions result negative results for everyone. Microsoft does the same thing with Surface RT. Apple does something similar with a specialized firmware.
Silverlight for mac 10.12 install#
Simple way to prove this is bad too…if MSFT had just announced this, would you cheer? What about if it was Apple, would you trust it? If simply changing the word Google for MSFT or Apple makes you turn against it then its probably a very bad idea, but you have fanboy blinders on.Ĭhrome does not make itself automatically default, don’t spread lies.Īs for the second how about the fact you buy a “ChromeBook” and you have what WAS a bog standard X86 laptop that has been so locked down they you can ONLY install an alternative OS by going into “dev mode” and even after all that can you install any OS you want on YOUR laptop?Ī ChromeBook is a specialised device – they are free to do all kinds of crap.
Silverlight for mac 10.12 drivers#
Say what you will about MSFT but I can buy any brand new X86 laptop running Windows 8 and within 10 minutes be installing ANY OS that I choose, be it Linux,BSD, earlier versions of Windows, heck i could even go OS/2 Warp if eComstation has drivers for the hardware. Now how long you think those handful of guys making those hacked bootloaders are gonna bother?
Well there is using the spammer’s trick of having a third party completely unrelated to Google to have a Chrome install as well as taking the default browser spot for one.Īs for the second how about the fact you buy a “ChromeBook” and you have what WAS a bog standard X86 laptop that has been so locked down they you can ONLY install an alternative OS by going into “dev mode” and even after all that can you install any OS you want on YOUR laptop? Nope only one of a handful of Linux distros that have a HACKED BOOTLOADER (all run by single volunteers in their free time, good luck on getting any long term upgrades or support) will install and that is it. So don’t be fooled just becuase it’s Google they’re a publically traded corporation, and thus will fuck you just as fast as MS or Apple will, although they might be a little more cunning about it, and sneak in the back door when you’re least expecting it If this had been MS or Apple’s doing, people would be crying foul, and for good reason. Personally, I don’t really like Chrome all that much, so I hope this doesn’t happen.
Silverlight for mac 10.12 full#
Instead of creating web apps, they’re now creating ‘native’ apps that require Chrome to work.ĭo you remember just a few years ago how you really couldn’t get the full web experience without Flash? Do you REALLY want to go back to that, where half the websites you visit say ‘this website requires Chrome for optimum’ viewing? And when a new platform/OS is released, you hope and pray that Google ports Chrome over to it? And then you start getting shoddy support in platforms with a minority of users, like Linux. Then what happens when this new technology catches on? Devs start coding to this new ‘standard’, and tell everyone else to go fuck themselves. ‘It’s not tied to just one platform’, they say. ‘It’s a nice alternative to web apps’, they say. You offer up a browser plugin/extension API to give the dev capabilities that they can’t normally achieve with HTML. In the context offered, really how different is this from what java promised to do? the chrome browser just becomes the virtual machineĪctually, it’s more like Flash in this regard. Any developer can target chrome in addition to windows, macos, etc, so the api is apparently not closed. Lock in the web? it’s about using chrome as a platform for delivery of applications that may run independent from an internet connection if desired.
0 kommentar(er)
